Immigrants from Latvia vs Norwegian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Norwegian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Norwegians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Norwegian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,721,440 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,008,287 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.15%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 6.0% | 16.5% |
| Range | 5.7% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.95% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |