Immigrants from Hungary vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Poles
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,605 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Polish |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 32.0% | 47.7% |
| Range | 31.3% | 45.5% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 9.1% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |