Slavic vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from Laos
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from Laos
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from Laos Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,841,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from Laos |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 56.8% | 13.9% |
| Range | 56.3% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 7.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Laos by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Honduras (6.3%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |