Immigrants from Hungary vs Czech Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Czech
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Czechs
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Czech Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,671,605 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.060%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 32.0% | 32.8% |
| Range | 31.3% | 31.6% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 7.7% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Czechs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |