Sudanese vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Choctaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,115,679 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 57.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 5.1% | 15.8% |
| Range | 4.9% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 6.0% |
| Median | 2.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.64% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |