Cajun vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cajun
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cajuns
Choctaw
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,649,677 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 7.7%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 16.4% | 15.8% |
| Range | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 6.0% |
| Median | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Apache (3.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |