Armenian vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Armenians
Choctaw
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,763,377 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 64.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 15.8% |
| Range | 12.2% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 6.0% |
| Median | 2.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Russia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Belgium (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Argentinean (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |