Immigrants from Armenia vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Choctaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,705,709 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 58.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 5.2% | 15.8% |
| Range | 5.0% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 6.0% |
| Median | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Peruvian (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Chilean (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |