Immigrants from Israel vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Pima
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Pima
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 53.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 29.5% |
| Range | 24.0% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 11.0% |
| Median | 5.1% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |