Barbadian vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Barbadian
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Barbadians
Bermudans
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,290,556 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 14.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 10.5% | 11.7% |
| Range | 10.0% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.91% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |