Barbadian vs Macedonian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Barbadian
Macedonian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Barbadians
Macedonians
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
27.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Macedonian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,290,556 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,651,102 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 21.8%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 10.5% | 5.9% |
| Range | 10.0% | 5.4% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.91% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.99% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from West Indies (2.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from India (2.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Ghanaians | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from South Africa (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |