Immigrants from Western Asia vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Bermudans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.61%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 11.7% |
| Range | 25.0% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |