Immigrants from Australia vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Bermudans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 11.7% |
| Range | 21.0% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |