Spanish American Indian vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Bermudans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,148,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 6.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 11.7% |
| Range | 7.1% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |