Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Oceania
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.52%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 7.9% |
| Range | 8.3% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |