Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Luxembourger
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Luxembourgers
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Luxembourger Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,678,787 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 2.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 8.6% |
| Range | 8.3% | 7.9% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Luxembourgers by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Greek (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |