Bangladeshi vs Mexican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Mexican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Mexicans
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Mexican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,483,125 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.88%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Mexican |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 4.7% |
| Range | 8.3% | 2.5% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 0.56% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.41% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.41% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Mexicans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |