Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Hungary Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Hungary
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Hungary
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Hungary Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,680,611 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.934 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.15% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 32.0% |
| Range | 8.3% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Hungary by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |