Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
New Zealander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
New Zealanders
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 14.1% |
| Range | 8.3% | 13.6% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.3% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |