Bangladeshi vs Romanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Romanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Romanians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Romanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,801,954 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.99%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Romanian |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.091% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 24.7% |
| Range | 8.3% | 24.6% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Romanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |