Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Thailand Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Thailand
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Thailand
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Thailand Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,288 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 14.1% |
| Range | 8.3% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Thailand by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |