Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Norway Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Norway
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Norway
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Norway Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.24%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 20.5% |
| Range | 8.3% | 19.1% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 6.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Norway by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |