Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,129,407 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 16.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 7.9% |
Range | 14.1% | 6.5% |
Mean | 2.9% | 4.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Nicaraguan (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Central American (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |