Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from Oceania
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 8.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.95% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 7.9% |
Range | 19.6% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.7% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |