Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Oceania
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,834,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 9.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 7.9% |
Range | 17.7% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.3% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |