Houma vs Turkish Average Family Size
COMPARE
Houma
 Turkish
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Houma
Turks
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Turkish Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,313 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 3.18. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,663 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 3.16, a difference of 0.44%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Turkish | 
| Minimum | 2.55 | 2.20 | 
| Maximum | 4.42 | 5.00 | 
| Range | 1.87 | 2.80 | 
| Mean | 3.19 | 3.15 | 
| Median | 3.20 | 3.13 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.97 | 2.99 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.29 | 3.28 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.32 | 0.29 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.34 | 0.39 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.34 | 0.39 | 
Demographics Similar to Houma and Turks by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Osage (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (3.18, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.050%), Hungarian (3.18, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Moldova (3.18, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Albanian (3.17, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (3.17, a difference of 0.070%), Cape Verdean (3.17, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (3.17, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Cajuns | 2.4 /100 | #247  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Albanians | 1.5 /100 | #257  | Tragic 3.17  | 
| Turks | 1.3 /100 | #258  | Tragic 3.16  |