Houma vs Turkish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Houma
Turkish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Houma
Turks
11.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Turkish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,780,476 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,510,878 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Turkish |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 21.1% |
| Range | 17.7% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 8.0% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Turks by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Immigrants from Turkey (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Peru (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Norway (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Cheyenne (11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Portugal (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |