Japanese vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,890,243 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 27.2 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 18.0%), per capita income ($39,870 compared to $43,003, a difference of 7.9%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $54,722, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $57,975, a difference of 0.10%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $38,436, a difference of 0.24%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 123.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.7%).