Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,756,542 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.709% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to a decrease of 709.0 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $33,931, a difference of 48.6%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $44,960, a difference of 35.5%), and median family income ($112,323 compared to $83,639, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $50,422, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $52,801, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 66.3%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 56.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 55.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.55%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.2%), no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 43.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 99.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 92.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 87.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%).