Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,106,844 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Immigrants from Nigeria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $40,339, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $86,589, a difference of 24.0%), and median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $51,310, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $58,942, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $49,174, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.8%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 35.5%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%).