Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,396,761 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.396% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 396.3 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $120,333, a difference of 21.0%), median household income ($86,635 compared to $104,692, a difference of 20.8%), and per capita income ($47,248 compared to $56,584, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $68,495, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $57,075, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.8%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.06 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%).