Tlingit-Haida vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
 Hungarian
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Hungarians
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,779,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Hungarian | 
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.88% | 
| Maximum | 90.9% | 62.3% | 
| Range | 90.5% | 61.5% | 
| Mean | 18.5% | 14.3% | 
| Median | 9.7% | 8.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 18.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 12.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.6% | 13.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 13.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Hungarians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147  | Good 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148  | Good 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149  | Good 10.0%  | 
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150  | Good 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151  | Good 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158  | Good 10.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159  | Good 10.1%  |