Burmese vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Burmese
Hungarian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Burmese
Hungarians
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,501,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 28.5% | 62.3% |
| Range | 28.0% | 61.5% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 14.3% |
| Median | 7.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Hungarians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |