New Zealander vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
New Zealander
Hungarian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
New Zealanders
Hungarians
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Hungarian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Hungarian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 62.3% |
Range | 17.7% | 61.5% |
Mean | 5.9% | 14.3% |
Median | 4.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Hungarians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |