Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham 3 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Jordanian
Tohono O'odham
3 or more Vehicles in Household
3 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Jordanians
Tohono O'odham
20.1%
3 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
3 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
14.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Tohono O'odham 3 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,358,031 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with 3 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,717,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of households with 3 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 6.7%.
3 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 45.6% |
Range | 70.3% | 37.1% |
Mean | 22.4% | 24.1% |
Median | 20.7% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 31.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by 3 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by 3 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 3 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Lithuanian (20.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Ottawa (20.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Iranian (20.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Palestinian (20.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Australian (20.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 3 or more Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | India | 87.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 87.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 20.2% |
Aleuts | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 20.2% |
Slovenes | 85.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 20.2% |
French American Indians | 85.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 20.1% |
Ottawa | 84.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.1% |
Jordanians | 84.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.1% |
Lithuanians | 84.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.1% |
Iranians | 84.0 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.1% |
Palestinians | 83.9 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.1% |
Australians | 83.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.1% |
Slovaks | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.1% |
Guatemalans | 82.6 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.1% |
Immigrants | Iran | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by 3 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 3 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Romania (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (18.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Russian (18.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Chile (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 3 or more Vehicles in Household |
Central American Indians | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 19.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 22.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 19.0% |
Egyptians | 19.5 /100 | #198 | Poor 19.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 19.0 /100 | #199 | Poor 19.0% |
Argentineans | 18.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 18.9% |
Arabs | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 18.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 15.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 18.9% |
Tohono O'odham | 14.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 18.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 14.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 18.9% |
Russians | 14.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 18.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 14.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 18.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 13.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 18.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 18.8% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 18.8% |