Immigrants from Cuba vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Zimbabwean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Zimbabweans
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 3.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 37.5% |
| Range | 24.2% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |