Immigrants from Cuba vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Bhutanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Bhutanese
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 0.090%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 49.5% |
| Range | 24.2% | 48.0% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Bhutanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |