Maltese vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Maltese
Zimbabwean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Maltese
Zimbabweans
9.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,211,459 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 0.73%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 13.7% | 37.5% |
| Range | 13.5% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 6.6% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Delaware (9.2%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 97.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |