Immigrants from Cuba vs Lithuanian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Lithuanian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Lithuanians
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Lithuanian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,405,245 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 16.8% |
| Range | 24.2% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Lithuanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |