Immigrants from Cuba vs Polish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Polish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Poles
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Polish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,400,436 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 35.0% |
| Range | 24.2% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Poles by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |