Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Zimbabwean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Costa Ricans
Zimbabweans
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,314,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 17.8% | 37.5% |
Range | 16.7% | 37.0% |
Mean | 7.0% | 6.6% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Blackfeet (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 97.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |