Bhutanese vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Zimbabwean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bhutanese
Zimbabweans
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Zimbabwean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 3.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 49.5% | 37.5% |
| Range | 48.0% | 37.0% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.6% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Zimbabweans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% |