Zimbabwean vs Slovene Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Slovene
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Slovenes
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Slovene Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,044,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,332,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Slovene |
Minimum | 0.32% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 60.0% |
Range | 28.8% | 58.5% |
Mean | 11.0% | 17.2% |
Median | 9.2% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Slovenes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |