Zimbabwean vs Indonesian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Indonesian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Indonesians
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Indonesian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,334,988 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 55.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Indonesian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 33.8% |
Range | 5.9% | 32.6% |
Mean | 3.4% | 7.9% |
Median | 3.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Indonesians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |