Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Vietnam
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Vietnam
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
75.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,957,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Vietnam |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 24.8% | 45.5% |
| Range | 22.7% | 44.1% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| Median | 7.3% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Vietnam by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |