Yugoslavian vs Portuguese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Portuguese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Portuguese
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Portuguese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,303,830 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,364,700 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 24.8% | 23.1% |
| Range | 22.7% | 22.3% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 8.7% |
| Median | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Portuguese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |