Puget Sound Salish vs New Zealander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
New Zealander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
New Zealanders
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
84.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs New Zealander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,147,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.25%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 32.1% |
| Range | 21.4% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| Median | 10.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and New Zealanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |