Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Norway Male Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Norway
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Norway
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
84.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Norway Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,147,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,684,379 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.35%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 23.8% | 58.1% |
| Range | 21.4% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Median | 10.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Norway by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |