Paiute vs Comanche Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Paiute
Comanche
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Paiute
Comanche
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paiute vs Comanche Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,262,204 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 25.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%, a difference of 0.11%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paiute | Comanche |
Minimum | 10.1% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.2% |
Range | 89.9% | 67.8% |
Mean | 40.2% | 34.6% |
Median | 36.2% | 29.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.1% | 47.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.8% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.7% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Paiute and Comanche by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.47%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |