Irish vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Irish
Mongolian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Irish
Mongolians
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Mongolian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,406,240 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,540,451 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.68%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.5% |
| Range | 95.2% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 15.8% |
| Median | 15.3% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.1% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.7% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.6% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Irish and Mongolians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and English (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |